Archives

Print

What a Web he weaves: Lawmaker Jesse White disappoints with cowardly commenting

Written by Pittsburgh Post-Gazette on . Posted in Archives

There's nothing wrong with standing on the modern-day equivalent of a soap box and pronouncing a strong opinion, especially when the voice is that of an elected official on an important policy matter.

That's what state Rep. Jesse White, a Cecil Democrat, seemed to be doing when he posted criticism of Marcellus Shale gas drilling on the Internet using his own name. Given that natural gas fracking is a booming industry in his Washington County district, it even seemed to be a bold step for a politician.

But Mr. White turned his social media campaign on its head when he violated the rules of fair commentary by creating fictitious online personas and using them to speak out on issues and, worse, to attack real people who disagreed with him. So-called "trolls" who use phony identities have been particularly common on the topic of fracking, but it nonetheless was a foolish move on the part of a lawmaker.

His juvenile behavior hurt his own reputation, of course, and it has drawn the attention of prosecutors in both Washington and Dauphin counties, since he has a Western Pennsylvania office and one in Harrisburg. Mr. White made matters even worse by initially denying the accusations, made by KDKA-TV's Andy Sheehan during a May 29 report, only to apologize for his actions later.

It appears that Mr. White used several screen names and was prolific in writing under those handles. Ironically, while writing under his own name, he complained about anonymous online writers "who would never have the guts to say such nonsense at a public meeting, but flourish in a coward's paradise provided by an Internet connection."

His critique of the perils of anonymous online commentary was well-taken; too bad he was talking about himself.

The Internet can provide the public, and public officials, with a remarkable opportunity for dialogue, a chance to share information and opinions in wide-ranging forums. (Full disclosure: The Post-Gazette's own website requires commenters to register using Facebook accounts, which helps to cut down on the use of false identities but is certainly not foolproof.) Such open exchanges have been a pillar of our democracy since the formation of our nation.

Modern-day politicians have used social media to reach out to their constituents and provide services at a rapid pace. Witness the success of Newark, N.J., Mayor Cory Booker, who uses Twitter incessantly to inform citizens and elicit information from them.

Mr. White turned what could have been a positive, informative process into an embarrassment.

Print

Gas drilling stays in limbo in Northeast Pennsylvania

Written by Steve McConnell / The (Scranton) Times-Tribune on . Posted in Archives

DAMASCUS, Pa. -- Standing on a hilltop above his Wayne County cattle farm, Bob Rutledge surveys rolling hills and a sea of green grass.

His gaze falls to the earth beneath his worn brown boots, where he believes more than a mile below the surface lies an opportunity -- natural gas.

But Mr. Rutledge, whose ragged blue jeans betray his love for hard work, will never know if that opportunity can be realized unless an obscure regulatory agency lifts its ban on drilling in the Delaware River basin.

"We don't know because we will never know," said Mr. Rutledge, 48, of Damascus, whose ancestors began settling here a few years before the Civil War. "To have it right at our fingertips and have it actually happening just 30 miles away is disappointing."

While gas drilling thrives throughout the state, a large swath of northeast Pennsylvania still remains off-limits.

This is in stark contrast to what is happening in a neighboring watershed, the Susquehanna River basin. There, the Susquehanna River Basin Commission has exercised less control over the industry, leaving most of the regulation, besides water withdrawals, to the state.

In May 2010, the Delaware River Basin Commission, based in West Trenton, N.J., declared a moratorium on natural gas extraction within the basin, a nearly 14,000-square-mile watershed that straddles four states and is home to the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area.

Since then, environmentalists and landowners in favor of gas drilling have tried to persuade, through their attorneys and massive letter-writing campaigns, the commission to either completely close the door on the industry or open the watershed to wide-scale development.

Yet three years later, nothing has changed.

Environmentalists are pleased, but worried the commission may lift the moratorium.

Landowners, who want their land developed, are becoming more frustrated and fear gas companies will pull out.

Mr. Rutledge heads the Northern Wayne Property Owners Alliance, which banded together nearly 1,300 families to lease tens of thousands of acres for development to two drilling companies, Hess Corp. and Newfield Exploration Co.

Those companies, which partnered to explore the potential of the Marcellus Shale in Wayne County, have exercised a provision in their lease with NWPOA that allows them to halt lease payments to landowners until the commission lifts the ban.

"It just aggravates me, because we went through a lot of effort and spent a lot of time," said Mr. Rutledge, whose 500-acre farm is under lease.

Mr. Rutledge believes gas development would have a huge economic impact. Most of northern Wayne County is jobless wilderness and farmland. He listed community members who have committed suicide because of financial troubles.

If given the economic boom, a "farmer can work with something else than 50-year-old equipment," he said. "We got our beautiful scenery, but we're living in poverty. A lot of our members are getting fed up waiting ... because of a bunch of politicians working in other states."

Politics is a real aspect to the battle over environmental and mineral rights concerns in the watershed, where much of the fight consists of behind-the-scenes negotiations and bickering.

Then, there is the difficulty of trying to get five governments with vastly different constituencies to work together on a complicated and divisive issue.

The governors of Pennsylvania, Delaware, New Jersey and New York and a federal representative from the Army Corps of Engineers make up the five-member river basin commission board, which has the power to give the go-ahead or bar drilling with a single vote.

"It's not a simple process to develop a regulatory framework for something as complicated as natural gas drilling and have five governments work out the particulars," commission spokesman Clarke Rupert said.

A product of the Kennedy administration, the commission is charged with protecting water quality and quantity in the basin, which provides drinking water to millions of people in New York City as well as numerous communities in New Jersey and Pennsylvania.

At the time the commission announced the moratorium, it said the move was necessary to allow for development of its own environmental safety regulations over the industry, which would be in addition to state environmental rules gas.

Meanwhile, more than 100,000 acres leased to gas companies in Wayne County cannot be drilled to extract gas.

Pike and Monroe counties and small portions of Lackawanna and Luzerne counties are also subject to the moratorium, although leasing has not been as extensive in these areas.

No Marcellus Shale well has been hydraulically fractured in the Delaware River watershed. But in the Susquehanna River watershed, scores of wells are producing gas.

Curt Coccodrilli's land straddles the dividing line.

He would like a gas well on his Jefferson, Lackawanna County, property near Archbald Mountain Road, except nearly all of his 125 acres lay in the Delaware River watershed.

A small sliver, about an acre or two, is in the Susquehanna River watershed.

He believes gas companies have been reluctant to lease his property because of the commission's ban, although some experts say there is no viable gas production potential in Lackawanna County.

That remains to be seen.

"To literally cut off a section of Pennsylvania, we feel like we are in no-man's land," said Mr. Coccodrilli, a member of the NWPOA who has other leased land by Hess and Newfield in northern Wayne County.

"We feel like we are second-class citizens in our own state," Mr. Coccodrilli said, likening it to an "economic iron curtain."

"Three years later, there is just zero communication about it [with the DRBC]," he said. "Just do something."

The DRBC did allow a handful of exploratory wells to be drilled in Wayne County because those wells received permits from the state Department of Environmental Protection prior to when the moratorium was declared.

Texas-based Newfield Exploration Co. and New York City-based Hess Corp. drilled five exploratory wells as part of that agreement.

The agency released its rough draft of natural gas regulations for public review and comment in December 2010.

Afterward, pro- and anti-drilling concerns flooded the agency with tens of thousands of written comments about the rules.

In November 2011, the DRBC published another set of draft regulations, guided by public comment.

The commission scheduled a special meeting later that month to consider adopting the rules. The meeting was postponed and has never been rescheduled.

For Mr. Coccodrilli and other landowners in the basin, they are fed up with waiting and fear that gas companies like Newfield and Hess may walk away because it appears there will be no chance gas extraction will happen in the Delaware River watershed.

"Over here, we have commercially viable shale, and we can't extract it," Mr. Coccodrilli said.

"The anti-drilling community held [the DRBC] hostage," he said.

That community couldn't be happier, but they realize any day the playing field could change.

All it takes is a vote.

"This moratorium is extremely fragile," said Barbara Arrindell, director of Damascus Citizens for Sustainability, an environmental group with an office just across the Delaware River from Wayne County in Narrowsburg, N.Y.

"Within 10 days they could call a meeting and pass" the regulations, she said.

They have been fighting to keep gas drilling out of the basin. They believe the industry pollutes water and air, will ruin the Delaware River and spoil the vast, undeveloped forests in the basin.

"Overall, the cumulative impacts are huge," Ms. Arrindell said. The Delaware River basin "is not ours to despoil. It's not ours to trash. It belongs to the future. ... Trucks, spills -- do we want this? Should anybody be subject to this?"

She believes gas development will lead to the industrialization of the watershed, damage its pristine beauty, and harm human health.

"We were formed preliminarily in response to this threat and continue to regard it as the biggest threat to the environment and health of the watershed ... that we've ever seen," she said.

The commission does not have a vote scheduled to consider the revised drilling rules, Mr. Rupert said. He does not know when that will happen.

"As soon as we get the word ... we'll get that word out to folks as quickly as possible," he said.

"[The commissioners] continue to have discussions and consultations with each other [and] working cooperatively to reach a consensus."

Print

Marcellus Shale drillers to pay $202.47M in per-well impact fees for 2012

Written by Timothy McNulty / Pittsburgh Post-Gazette on . Posted in Archives

The state will pay out slightly less in Marcellus Shale impact funds to counties and municipalities this year, tied to a mandated drop in per-well drilling fees.

The state Public Utility Commission announced natural gas drillers would pay $202.5 million in fees for 2012, down less than a percentage point from the $204.2 million they paid the previous year. About half of the money -- $102.7 million -- will go to counties and localities impacted by drilling, $71.8 million will go to long-term projects and $28 million to state agencies working on drilling matters.

Washington County will receive the second-most funding of any county statewide, at $4.7 million. Two of its municipalities, Chartiers ($578,165) and Amwell (576,941), are among the five highest-grossing localities statewide. Another, Mount Pleasant, fell out of the top-tier for 2012 but will still get $471,000 and is the seventh highest-grossing municipality in the state over the past two years.

Mount Pleasant manager Mary Ann Stevenson said the township is still appropriating last year's impact fees, with the bulk of it going into the design and engineering of sewage infrastructure for property owners, instead of septic tanks. "That's the big ticket. The rest is sitting in capital reserve," she said.

The PUC is supposed to send government bodies their checks by the end of the month.

Bradford County in the state's northeast will collect the most at $7.3 million. Lycoming and Tioga counties follow Washington with $4.4 million each.

Lawrence in Clearfield County will clear the most local impact money with $797,000 followed by Cumberland in Greene County at $787,000 and the city of Williamsport in Lycoming at $593,000.

Allegheny County will get $1.1 million, Butler $1.2 million, Fayette $1.3 million, Greene $2.9 million and Westmoreland $1.6 million. Even Philadelphia County, which has no wells, will get $1.3 million for long-term projects.

"To see how this new revenue stream, now totaling more than $406 million is being distributed to every corner of the commonwealth is a vivid illustration and reminder of how safe, tightly regulated natural gas development is benefiting local communities, statewide programs and funding of government agencies," said Kathryn Klaber, CEO of the gas industry's Marcellus Shale Coalition.

"Our member companies are working ... to ensure we get this historic opportunity right for all 12 million-plus Pennsylvanians."

Under legislation Gov. Tom Corbett signed in February 2012, the per-well drilling fees companies pay is tied to the price of natural gas. Since prices dropped in 2012, those drilling new horizontal wells paid $45,000 per well last year compared to $50,000 the year before. Second-year wells paid $35,000.

The average price of gas dropped from $4.10 per thousand cubic feet in 2011 to $2.78 in 2012.

The trends will likely continue into the impact fees distributed next year. While there were 78 active drilling rigs statewide in July 2012, there were 54 statewide as of this month.

Chesapeake Appalachia made the most gas producer payments to the state at $27.4 million followed by Range Resources at nearly $24 million and Talisman Energy at $20 million.

Tim McNulty:  This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.  or 412-263-1581.

Print

Allegheny County considers drilling beneath parks

Written by Andrew McGill / Pittsburgh Post-Gazette on . Posted in Archives

Allegheny County is mulling over drilling for natural gas underneath at least one county park, a county councilman says.

County executive Rich Fitzgerald has held discussions with local firm Huntley & Huntley, Inc., a partner with energy giant Range Resources, councilman Nick Futules said Wednesday. The company is primarily interested in Deer Lakes Park, an 1,180-acre wooded area in West Deer and Frazer townships.

"They're having a conversation with the county executive over any future possibilities," said Mr. Futules, who is chairman of the council's parks committee. "They're in negotiations now, I imagine."

Any extraction would take place outside park grounds, with a external well pad drilling horizontally underneath the park, he said.

Huntley & Huntley, a century-old Monroeville engineering firm that has branched into shale in recent years, has systematically leased out much of the land surrounding Deer Lakes Park. Since Jan. 1, it has signed nearly two dozen new leases in bordering townships.

Company executives say they've partnered with Range to do the actual drilling; the larger company also has several leases in the area.

On May 24, Range secured permits to drill three wells off Fairfield Road in Frazer, less than 1,000 feet away from the park, according to state records.

"The drilling is going to go on around these parks with or without the parks," said Michael Hillebrand, Huntley & Huntley's executive vice president. "We just don't want a resource wasted that's sitting under these county properties. All these officials would need to say is, 'Yeah, we want the park to be included.' "

Mr. Fitzgerald wouldn't admit to meeting with Range or Huntley & Huntley, saying he won't discuss private business meetings. But as far as he's concerned, any county property should be considered for drilling. And if a county park sees development, he thinks a portion of the proceeds should go to its maintenance.

"If we're drilling in Settlers Cabin, I think most of the money that was earmarked for parks should go towards that particular park," he said. "Those are the folks who would be putting up with any inconvenience."

Any landman worth his salt looked on county land with added interest after this spring, when the Allegheny County Airport Authority opened 9,000 acres surrounding Pittsburgh International Airport to drilling. Such a large block is rarely available, and the possibility the county would be open to further development at large public sites has perked up ears.

Some parks are not up for grabs, Mr. Hillebrand said. For instance, he believes North Park and South Park have too many homes nearby, meaning any driller would have to make the politically difficult pitch to pave a pad on park grounds.

But his company sees opportunity at Round Hill Park, which stretches across 1,101 acres in Elizabeth Township. Since January, Huntley & Huntley has signed more than 10 leases bordering the park.

Any decision regarding the parks will be run by Mr. Futules and the members of his committee, Mr. Fitzgerald said. He'd also have to get council's permission before signing any lease.

The county is still nowhere near having a deal, he said.

"People are looking at it. I know council is interested in it," Mr. Fitzgerald said. "A lot of it will come down to how much money it will be worth to the county."

Andrew McGill:  This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.  or 412-263-1497.

Print

U.S. Energy Information Administration releases new shale oil and gas report

Written by Andrew Gretchko on . Posted in Archives

fig1map large

The U.S. Energy Information Administration released its latest report on shale oil and gas across the globe, citing increasing numbers in its overall estimates. Above, a map displays assessed basins with and without oil and gas estimates.

Yesterday, the U.S. Energy Information Administration released a report on shale oil and gas at home and overseas that raises the global shale gas resource estimate by 10 percent over the last report done two years ago.

The report, which covers 137 shale formations in 41 countries, indicates that there are 345 billion barrels of technically recoverable world shale oil resources and 7,299 trillion cubic feet of world shale gas resources. That's an 11 percent increase in shale oil, and a 47 percent increase between a combination of proven and unproven nonshale technically recoverable natural gas and shale gas.

The “new” shale resources come from geologic research and well drilling results not available for use in the 2011 report. The update has sent shockwaves around the world as nation’s react to the EIA’s assessment and the riches that lay below their feet. If they can harvest them.

Some countries, such as Britain, are facing backlash from citizens unhappy with the environmental impact of fracking. In Britain’s case, the tremors allegedly caused by fracking in 2011 have yet to be forgotten and have been used as a rallying cry for environmentalists weary of further drilling.

According to the report, the top five countries with the most technically recoverable shale oil resources are Russia, the U.S., China, Argentina and Libya, in that order. The top five countries with technically recoverable shale gas resources are China, Argentina, Algeria, the U.S. and Canada, in that order.

The report also makes it clear that there is a difference between a technically recoverable resource – the volume of oil and natural gas that can be produced with current technology – and an economically recoverable resources – resources that can be profitably produced under current market conditions based on the costs of drilling and completing wells, the amount of oil or natural gas produced from an average well over its lifetime and the prices received for oil and gas production.

The EIA also indicates that these estimates will likely change over time as additional information becomes available. Other notable changes from the 2011 report, include reductions in the estimates at Norway's Alum Shale, Poland's Lubin Basin, Mexico's Eagle Ford Shale in the Burgos Basin, South Africa's Karoo Basin, and China's Qiongzhusi Shale in the Sichuan Basin and the Lower Cambrian shales in the Tarim Basin.